Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2019³â 49±Ç 6È£ p.404 ~ 412
Goracci Cecilia, Ozcan Mutlu, Franchi Lorenzo, Di Bello Giuseppe, Louca Chris, Vichi Alessandro,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Goracci Cecilia ) - University of Siena Department of Medical Biotechnologies
 ( Ozcan Mutlu ) - University of Zurich Centre for Dental and Oral Medicine
 ( Franchi Lorenzo ) - University of Florence Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine
 ( Di Bello Giuseppe ) - University of Siena Department of Medical Biotechnologies
 ( Louca Chris ) - University of Portsmouth Dental Academy
 ( Vichi Alessandro ) - University of Portsmouth Dental Academy

Abstract


Objective: To assess shear bond strength and failure mode (Adhesive Remnant Index, ARI) of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks for computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) fabrication of temporary restorations, following substrate chemical or mechanical treatment.

Methods: Two types of PMMA blocks were tested: CAD-Temp¢ç (VITA) and Telio¢ç CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent). The substrate was roughened with 320-grit sandpaper, simulating a fine-grit diamond bur. Two universal adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU) and Assure Plus (AP), and a conventional adhesive, Transbond XT Primer (XTP; control), were used in combination with Transbond XT Paste to bond the brackets. Six experimental groups were formed: (1) CAD-Temp ¢ç/SU; (2) CAD-Temp¢ç/AP; (3) CAD-Temp¢ç/XTP; (4) Telio¢ç CAD/SU; (5) Telio¢ç CAD/AP; (6) Telio¢ç CAD/XTP. Shear bond strength and ARI were assessed. On 1 extra block for each PMMA-based material surfaces were roughened with 180-grit sandpaper, simulating a normal/medium-grit (100 ¥ìm) diamond bur, and brackets were bonded. Shear bond strengths and ARI scores were compared with those of groups 3, 6.

Results: On CAD-Temp¢ç significantly higher bracket bond strengths than on Telio¢ç CAD were recorded. With XTP significantly lower levels of adhesion were reached than using SU or AP. Roughening with a coarser bur resulted in a significant increase in adhesion.

Conclusions: Bracket bonding to CAD/CAM PMMA can be promoted by grinding the substrate with a normal/medium-grit bur or by coating the intact surface with universal adhesives. With appropriate pretreatments, bracket adhesion to CAD/CAM PMMA temporary restorations can be enhanced to clinically satisfactory levels.

Å°¿öµå

Bracket; Bonding; Adhesive; Prosthodontics

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

    

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed